I couldn’t settle to writing a review of the past two years. Instead, I just listened to Classic FM, and tried to write some more critiques on Photosig. It was too much hard work. I critiqued some people who had put notes on my photos, then marked their critiques as “useful”. Most of them were the “Nice shot” variety, though.
I put a message on a photo by IceRock from Iceland. However, it seems not too have been taken too well. I had to write a P.S explaining my rationale:
Nice one, IceRock. I like the ice blue centre, with black background and warmth in the post and sundial arm.
I think you could have used 1/60 @ f4.0, but I don’t think it would have greatly improved the DOF. One suggestion I have read, is to take two photos from the same position – one focused on the rear and the other on the front. Then, use stitching software to join the two.
With greater DOF, I think I would also like to see more of the sunlit post – moving the camera slightly to the left. This would also mean that the line of the sundial arm would lead down to the bright front. Furthermore, a slightly lower position would put more of the dial above the rim.
Cheers, Reggie.
P.S. (added in response to the comment on my photo):
Apologies for not explaining myself. I gave some technical advice without explaining why. Sorry for this poor critique.
My rationale is that “frozen” is probably best illustrated by pin-sharp. To my mind, “out-of-focus” is more likely to represent “melting”. The title and accompanying comments are, to my mind, as much a part of the picture as the pixels, since they help to identify the intent of the photo.
Hope this helps to explain my comments. I agree – many people on this website can’t see the pictures for the pixels – or the wood for the trees! Happy New Year!
